tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6723937561506139096.post3579225064953597702..comments2023-12-20T08:18:00.872+10:00Comments on kae's bloodnut blog: something just reminded me of this....kaehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05819693069445947851noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6723937561506139096.post-59161154599665259502009-05-17T07:57:00.000+10:002009-05-17T07:57:00.000+10:00Hi RebeccaH
Hmm.
You never saw Dogma? (The movie.)...Hi RebeccaH<br />Hmm.<br />You never saw Dogma? (The movie.)<br /><br />Angels have no sex.<br /><br />Perhaps that's female-looking angels?<br /><br />(Now if it was "someone else", he'd be chasing cherubs, huh!)kaehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05819693069445947851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6723937561506139096.post-79718816299800632042009-05-17T07:53:00.000+10:002009-05-17T07:53:00.000+10:00Celibate. Celebrate. A rose is a rose by any oth...Celibate. Celebrate. A rose is a rose by any other name.<br /><br />(I have a naughty picture in my head of the Pope wistfully following female angels around.)RebeccaHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15113907852048577121noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6723937561506139096.post-84421656697934855032009-05-12T16:26:00.000+10:002009-05-12T16:26:00.000+10:00Nah, the joke's still funny, which is the main thi...Nah, the joke's still funny, which is the main thing. And anyway, the whole joke hinges on a spelling mistake. I just thought it was a little odd, with the Pope (in heaven) being a linguistic genius and all.TimThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10333303180015967125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6723937561506139096.post-87490990825315201102009-05-12T14:52:00.000+10:002009-05-12T14:52:00.000+10:00Hmm, I should have corrected the thing before I cu...Hmm, I should have corrected the thing before I cutted and pasted it?<br /><br />Nah. No time! It was just a quickie... perhaps he was pouring wax on it?kaehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05819693069445947851noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6723937561506139096.post-50863332621199773552009-05-12T14:47:00.000+10:002009-05-12T14:47:00.000+10:00First reaction: HA!
Second reaction: pedantic ni...First reaction: HA! <br /><br />Second reaction: pedantic niggles to follow... <br /><br />The angels need an editor! If the Pope 'pours' over Bibles, what sort of liquid is he pouring? And shouldn't he 'pore' over every edition of the Bible instead? <br /><br />And did the angels really mean to write 'celibrate' instead of 'celibate', or was it meant to be 'celebate'/'celebrate'? <br /><br />Apologies for pedanticism. I hope the Pope in question, who is a linguistic master, after all, will look upon it kindly...TimThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10333303180015967125noreply@blogger.com