And peeling spuds in a jungle hunting camp is a superb grounding in pedagogy and a fast track to mastering heads. She recognised the need to progress beyond the limitations of her studies, and has a list of useful accomplishments in her current field of study. Given the present state of that field of study, she is probably rather better informed than her critics. This is unlike certain claimants to the job-title "schoolmaster", who display no evidence of either. You are, at least, consistent in your efforts to denigrate grunts.
Hmm 17, so Al Gore, Tim Flannery, Ross Garnaut, are all qualified are they?
Your argument is irrelevant. The only counter that people who believe in AGW can use against anyone who doesn't swallow the AWG swindle is to say they aren't qualified to comment. "Climate Scientist"is a recent occupation invented because of the availability of funding for AGW-supporting [only] "climate" research.
How about you chat about it on your blog with all your friends?
You only come here to stir the pot and people are awake up to you.
Disppointing really that no one here can be bothered to argue with you, when you really have no argument at all and that is with any argumentative comment you post.
5 comments:
That is a book to go on my must read list. Thanks Kae.
Obviously her degree in women's studies makes her eminently qualified to write on climate science....
And peeling spuds in a jungle hunting camp is a superb grounding in pedagogy and a fast track to mastering heads. She recognised the need to progress beyond the limitations of her studies, and has a list of useful accomplishments in her current field of study. Given the present state of that field of study, she is probably rather better informed than her critics. This is unlike certain claimants to the job-title "schoolmaster", who display no evidence of either. You are, at least, consistent in your efforts to denigrate grunts.
Cheers
Hmm 17, so Al Gore, Tim Flannery, Ross Garnaut, are all qualified are they?
Your argument is irrelevant. The only counter that people who believe in AGW can use against anyone who doesn't swallow the AWG swindle is to say they aren't qualified to comment.
"Climate Scientist"is a recent occupation invented because of the availability of funding for AGW-supporting [only] "climate" research.
How about you chat about it on your blog with all your friends?
You only come here to stir the pot and people are awake up to you.
Disppointing really that no one here can be bothered to argue with you, when you really have no argument at all and that is with any argumentative comment you post.
What he really wants is Noni to read him a bed-time story. Slowly so he can keep up with the details.
Cheers
Post a Comment