Saturday, August 21, 2010

Nine's Election Coverage

Has been good.

Lots of highlights.

Particularly Michael Kroger's attack on Swan's ineptitude as a treasurer... just beautiful, Swan didn't know what to do.

So many highlights, and you'd see them if you watched the program.


Windsmoke. said...

Election coverage is so boring it's the winner that counts not the highlights.

stackja1945 said...

Virtual Tally Room

Craig W said...

I thought the Channel 9 coverage was pretty good and whilst the panel had digs at each other, it was all fairly civil - except for the amazingly annoying Christine Wallace. My wife has zero interest in politics but endured me flicking through the channels for the night. She found Wallace and Arbib annoying. I thought it was amusing watching him eat humble pie. Watching Peter Costello and Michael Kroger in action reminded me of a political talent lost and another one we never saw in Parliament. Mores the pity in my opinion.

kae said...

You don'thave to watch. I find a lot of election coverage is dry and just plain boring or one-sided. But the Channel 9 coverage was brilliant for the, er, lively discussions!

kae said...

Hi Stacks
Thanks for the link.

kae said...

Craig W
Yes, I agree. It was entertaining!

kae said...

Hi all
I had a problem with my personal emails from yesterday AM and they only came up thisafternoon.
A fire in the data/info section of my ISP, which is also UQ - chaos with the data bases and access at UQ.