Saturday, August 21, 2010

Nine's Election Coverage

Has been good.

Lots of highlights.

Particularly Michael Kroger's attack on Swan's ineptitude as a treasurer... just beautiful, Swan didn't know what to do.

So many highlights, and you'd see them if you watched the program.

7 comments:

Windsmoke. said...

Election coverage is so boring it's the winner that counts not the highlights.

stackja1945 said...

Virtual Tally Room http://vtr.aec.gov.au/

Craig W said...

I thought the Channel 9 coverage was pretty good and whilst the panel had digs at each other, it was all fairly civil - except for the amazingly annoying Christine Wallace. My wife has zero interest in politics but endured me flicking through the channels for the night. She found Wallace and Arbib annoying. I thought it was amusing watching him eat humble pie. Watching Peter Costello and Michael Kroger in action reminded me of a political talent lost and another one we never saw in Parliament. Mores the pity in my opinion.

kae said...

Windsmoke,
You don'thave to watch. I find a lot of election coverage is dry and just plain boring or one-sided. But the Channel 9 coverage was brilliant for the, er, lively discussions!

kae said...

Hi Stacks
Thanks for the link.

kae said...

Craig W
Yes, I agree. It was entertaining!

kae said...

Hi all
I had a problem with my personal emails from yesterday AM and they only came up thisafternoon.
A fire in the data/info section of my ISP, which is also UQ - chaos with the data bases and access at UQ.